In rugby,
your more conservative coaches used to believe in a golden line. A line that
went straight through the heart of any team, and in fact formed the beat of
many a team. The math was simple. You draw a straight line starting with
the hooker, passing both the locks, running through the eightman, the
scrumhalf, flyhalf and eventually ending up with the fullback. These were the
positions that one would prefer your more experienced players, calming things
down whenever the bounce of the ball seems to be bouncing in favour of the
opposition.
John Smit,
Sean Fitzpatrick, John Eales, Martin Johnson, Lawrence Dallaglio, Fourie du
Preez, Johnny Wilkinson, Dan Carter, Percy Montgomery and Andre Joubert are all
perfect examples of
players illustrating what the Golden Line in rugby
exemplifies. They are all match winners in own right but prefer the spotlight
on the chap next to them, playing with an attitude of “ nothing flashy, just do
the basics right”.
Some
coaches on the contrary, prefer not to believe in the Golden Line and fancy
their playmakers in the exact same positions, and no example could be more
suitable than Carlos Spencer, Quade Cooper, Zinzane Brooke and Isreal Felou.
These are all game breakers who tend to steal the show and believe to be in
exactly the right position to do so…
Following
Springbok rugby quite closely, I sense that Heinike Meyer might be at a split
road, especially regarding his first choice fullback. Over the last three seasons,
Heinike Meyer has invested quite heavily in Willie Le Roux, the young boy that
stole South African hearts by running at every opportunity he got. Le Roux
played a major part on all levels of the game, and very quickly became one of
the senior players in the Cheetah camp. Naka Drotsky unleashed Le Roux into
Super rugby as a wing and to his delight Le Roux made a massive impact in their
campaign. Although the Cheetahs were more often than not on the wrong side of
the score board, Le Roux was instrumental in almost every counter attack and
every try scored.
In 2013 Le Roux made
his Springbok debut and has since established himself as the number 1 contender
for the nr 15 jumper. With Jean de Villiers and Bryan Habana entering the final
phase of their careers, Le Roux has stepped up as the playmaker and the one
sparking fire of unpredictability. He is undoubtedly the man with the X-factor
in the Springbok backline and has the ability to generate 7 points from a
stop-start.
Meanwhile
in the shadow of a poor Super rugby campaign and a serious neck injury, HM
still has the option of Patrick Lambie to consider. Lambie has proven himself
on more than one occasion as Mr. reliable and a player loaded with big match
temperament. The typical “nothing flashy” type of guy that does all the basics
right, and making it look easy too. He always seems to be in full control and
just has this calmness about him. This is the perfect candidate for any coach
who still believes in the Golden line.
To chose
between the two is a bit like choosing between BMW and Mercedes Benz in the
late 80’s. The one is this incredible sporty ride with leather seats, while the
other one is this ridiculously elegant drive with a touch of sportiness… in the
end they were both equally quick and you will most certainly reach your
destination in both, the only question was how you prefer getting there. I tend
to opt with Patrick Lambie and here’s why.
Willie le
Roux is a far better rugby player than he is a fullback, meaning that he has
this raw type of talent that will excel in almost any position, as long as he
is on the park. Spotting gaps and running angles at high speed comes naturally
for this bloke and it’s not something that can be taught, but rather something
that you are born with. Such skills can be developed but you either have it or
you don’t. Playing from the back against ordinary opposition, Willie le Roux
will tear you apart. Just the other day he ran in three tries against the World
XV.
The flip
side though, is that against real quality opposition like the All Blacks, he
might be neutralized by them playing strategic footy. With proper analyzing
they can starve le Roux of the ball and whenever he enters the line he will
ultimately leave a void at the back. Because of this, I much rather prefer le
Roux on the wing. It makes it so much easier for him to enter that first five
eight channel and to fire out one of his trademark bullet passes to a speedster
running flat and into a gap. It opens up the option of a little chip kick
without leaving the back uncovered. Opposition is to be so much more aware of
the blind side with Le Roux possibly in that channel.
Its seriously much easier
to cover a wing out of position, compared to covering a fullback on the deck
and both wingers having to play towards their own goal line.
Patrick
Lambie offers you quite the opposite, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing. With
40 test caps Lambie has this mature approach, creating a sense of security at
the back. He is capable under the high ball, very seldom gets caught off guard
or out of position and when touch is needed he makes sure that the ball crosses
the white marker. Both South Africa’s WC winning teams consisted of a fullback
rather opting for a calm, steady approach and ones who left the flashy stuff to
the wingers and centers.
Being the
motor fanatic that I am, I would leave my Beamers out on the wing to show off
their speed and skill, while the Benz who epitomizes consistency, stability and
reliability takes charges from the back and insures the Golden Line to stay
intact.